3. The 2x Extender has some useful implications in macro work, offering an extra 100% magnification without sacrificing the minimum close-focusing distance; in the case of the 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM, this results in 0.32x magnification instead of 0.16x magnification. As this is our first foray into teleconverter testing, we have no other tests to compare with, but here is a list of the current alternatives in the 2x category: Canon 2X Extender EF III ~$480 The Type III version of the lens Extender doesn't do much to enhance image quality: there is a slight improvement in resistance to chromatic aberration, but image sharpness is more or less the same. Tips for Photographing the Great Conjunction. Presuming you're using a top super tele ( 300/2.8 , 400/2.8 , 500/4 , 600/4 and 800/5.6 specifically), the results should be excellent. The EF 2x II doubles the focal length of any lens it\'s mounted to, and reduces its effective aperture by two stops. I was in the Serengeti with the f4 100-400 without the teleconverter, and I can tell you that I wish I had more reach. Still it does give you much more reach at a modest cost, so you will probably have a love-hate relationship with it! When Canon announced two new Teleconverters (Extenders) to replace the 1.4 and 2x EF Extender IIs I was skeptical that there would be an improvement in image quality over the older MkII models. Free shipping . This image was created on 27 November 2020 at Fort DeSoto Park. I'm not a professional photographer, but I have shot extensively with all the gear you're discussing--and I've been on safari. Subscribe! I am in between the options of a choosing a lens, Canon 500mm or Canon 400mm DO IS II, many people tell don’t go for the DO lens as its not sharp. The finish of the lens is white, to match Canon's upper-tier L-class telephoto lenses, for which the lens is designed to be paired. Chromatic Aberration $125.00 0 bids + shipping . That's the good news - the bad news is the 2x decreases/narrows your lens' aperture setting by 2 stops. So, a 300mm lens beomes a 420mm with a 1.4x TC and a 600mm lens with a 2x TC. Canon lens extenders were designed in the era of film, making them fully compatible with full-frame, APS-H and APS-C EOS digital cameras. Z6 II vs Z7 II – which one is better for enthusiast. When used with a compatible lens, they will multiply the focal length of the lens by a factor of either 1.4x or 2x, at the cost of decreasing the lens' aperture by 1 or 2 stops respectively. I am using the 7D mark II, I want to use the 2x extender more often but the 7D mark II how is the AF speed and … > Canon 2x Extender EF Teleconverter Lens MKI . Conclusion There is a noticeable increase in chromatic aberration introduced by the 2x II Extender, at all apertures; you'll want to consult our sample images for more detail. The 200mm ƒ/2.8L offers light barrel distortion in the corners and overall, very light pincushion distortion: adding the 2x II Extender actually alleviates any problems of distortion, producing almost no distortion throughout the image. We'd like to thank LensRentals.com for their loan of this extender for our testing: to rent this lens, click here. For some unknown reason, when I stack both this 1.4x II and 2x II extenders, the camera reads two, not three stops, aperture change, and only 2x, not 2.8x, focal length increase. A 2X extender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. Required fields are marked *. That would cost you only one stop, making your lenses a much more manageable f/5.6. However, the big improvements are enhancements to autofocus speed and accuracy, as well as the addition of weather-resistant seals. For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens into a 140-400mm f/5.6 IS lens (yes, IS still functions normally on all compatible IS lenses). The 2x extender was more useful than the 1.4x extender. http://www.hitendrasinkar.com/index.php?x=browse&category=30&pagenum=1. and whem stacked with a 1.4X convertor the results at 1120mm F8, ain't shabby either:-)) At the time of writing this answer (December 2016), I don’t own the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, nor the Canon EF 2x extender, so I had to do a bit of research. Like! Thank you! Den här manualen är tillgänglig på följande språk: Svenska, Engelsk. The extender can be combined with the 1.4x Extender for a significant increase in focal length, but at the cost of significant reduction in light-gathering ability: you would lose three stops of light for an additional 240% in focal length, making your 200mm ƒ/2.8 lens the equivalent of a 480mm ƒ/8 lens. Se manualen för Canon Extender EF 2x II helt gratis här nedan. We reviewed the Canon 400mm ƒ/5.6L USM back in 2008, which makes a good candidate for comparison with the 200mm ƒ/2.8L USM and 2x Extender attached. This way the extended front element of this 1.4x will poke into the recess in the rear of the 2x extender. Your email address will not be published. At f/45 and especially f/64, things get pretty fuzzy. at f/10 (wide open!) Unlike the original 6D, the Mark II will give you some use with f/8 combinations in the same was as the 80D. Distortion You would get the benefit of better optical quality and the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range. My 2x II copy must've been a good one because I can't see any appreciable difference in IQ vs. the 2x III. This review will sound very similar to the Canon 1.4x Extender Review, but the 2x function is basically the same. Didn't care for the quality, I compared shoots to enlarging in Photoshop and it does minimally better but not by much, I tried 3 different examples before finding one that worked well with my lens, well built, nice way to get extra length when traveling, reviewed March 7th, 2007 Canon Extender EF 2x II Teleconverter #766. > The teleconverters (TC) will multiply the focal length of any EF lens used with them by either 1.4x or 2x. October 6, 2011by Andrew Alexander. The Canon EF 2x II Extender mounts between the compatible lens and body, and multiplies the focal length settings of your lens by 2. Since the day one its been attached to the 300/2.8L IS & I am completely satisfied. With the EF 2x II, AF is possible with any EOS body if the lens has an f/2.8 or faster maximum aperture, and compatible Image Stabilization lenses maintain … Thoughroughly recommended. At the widest setting of ƒ/5.6, the corners are only a 1/4 stop darker than the center. However, Canon warns that there is an impact on autofocus performance with type II and III Extenders. Well worth the effort though since I now have a 800mm f5.6 IS lens which gives great results. The Canon 1.4x II Extender is heavy for its size, at just under 8 ounces, suggesting a fair amount of metal in its construction. Without the extender, the lens shows very good results at ƒ/2.8, becoming almost tack-sharp at ƒ/4 through to ƒ/11. Images at f/8, f/11 and f/16 show essentially the same level of sharpness, good but not great, and then things soften up again as the lens is stopped down to f/32 or smaller. http://hitendrasinkar.com/index.php?showimage=171 In terms of sharpness, the two are quite similar: the 400mm is slightly better at ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/16, but at ƒ/8 and ƒ/11, they're almost identical. The real difference between the two lenses is the image stabilization. The Canon EF 2X II telephoto extender is a reasonably inexpensive way to double the focal length of some of the Canon lenses. 4. Mouse over to Zoom-Click to enlarge. Using the 2x II Extender alleviates corner shading noticed without the use of the extender, at the ƒ/2.8 setting, but that's only because the ƒ/2.8 aperture is no longer available. There are a few pro's and con's when considering going this route. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. Use either an original version or -II version 2x extender. Specifically, Canon suggests that AF drive speed is reduced by 75% when using the 2x Extender. For about the same price as the Canon EF 2X III you can buy an EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS. If you would like your review to be posted, please make sure that there is enough valuable information for others to read. I have both the 2x II and 2x III. The trade-off to the doubly extended range is the loss of two stops of light-gathering ability of the lens: accordingly, an ƒ/2.8 lens will operate as a ƒ/5.6 lens. bought and sold this one within a few months. The design of the lens is quite simple, 7 lens elements in 5 groups, and there is only one control surface on the extender: a switch to release an attached lens. Both available models of the hardware, the Canon 2x extender II and the Canon 2x extender III, are compatible with the same set of lenses, so there wont be any fussing over specifics regardless of the model youre interested in. Imaging Resource © 1998 - 2021. You'll never get tack-sharp results with the 2x II Extender attached: at f/5.6, the lens produced images of only moderate sharpness, with some improvement stopped down. The 2x series was introduced in 1987, and updated in 2001 with the version II model, the subject of this review. in … In our usage of the 2x II Extender, we noticed a significant impact on the autofocus performance of the 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM lens, which is fast and snappy all on its own. (purchased for $250). Of course to get great results, you must understand the best ways to use an extender. If that is still outside your budget you might consider the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II. This manual comes under the category Lenses and has been rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5. We shoot both images using the default JPEG settings and manual white balance of our test bodies, so the images should be quite consistent from lens to lens. A Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L Lens mounted over a … Features a new seven-element design, and same weather-resistant design and anti-reflection internal construction as the new EF 1.4x II. We used Canon's 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM telephoto lens to test the 2x II Extender, comparing the sharpness of the lens with and without the extender attached. About the Canon Extender EF 2x II View the manual for the Canon Extender EF 2x II here, for free. Macro For the ''VFA'' target (the viewfinder accuracy target from Imaging Resource), we also provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each shot, so you can quickly get a sense of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images. I wonder how the new RF mount 100-500mm performs… Canon 100-400 II + 1.4x Extender – Example 1 The EF 2x II doubles the focal length of any lens it\'s mounted to, and reduces its effective aperture by two stops. The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon.These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. ISO 800. With the Extender attached, sharpness is noticeably reduced. Shading (''Vignetting'') Obvious impact on image quality on multi-element lenses like the 70-200 2.8 is, but probably not as big an issue with the super teles. More info about teleconverters at http://sdp.io/TCWhich is better? Opens image gallery. Every lens will perform differently on this extender. As appropriate, we shoot these with both full-frame and sub-frame bodies, at a range of focal lengths, and at both maximum aperture and ƒ/8. (purchased for $299), reviewed January 1st, 2007 The Canon Extender 2x II II is almost as sharp as the main lens. Sharpness This is a topic that has been covered extensively in my ultimate guide to extenders/teleconverters. Canon extender : 1.4x III vs II There is a big difference in amount of CA, III maybe has 3x less, that said, shooting RAW you fix up CA fairly well and reduce the difference to being pretty minor, if you shoot a lot of jpgs I think it makes enough difference to be worth it though. Also, please do not forget to give a star ranking to the reviewed product. Autofocus Operation $185.77. The Canon 2x II Extender is heavy for its size, at just over 9 ounces, suggesting a fair amount of metal in its construction. Build Quality and Handling PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels. The range of Canon 1.4x and 2x lens extenders. I used the handheld Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM lens with the Canon Extender RF 1.4x (at 700mm) and the highly touted 45MP Canon EOS R5 Mirrorless Digital camera body. You can check the quality here Designed to extend a lenses focal length by a factor of 2x, the Canon Extender EF 2X III delivers optical performance on par with the finest Canon super telephoto lenses. With the EF 2x II, AF is possible with any EOS body if the lens has an f/2.8 or faster maximum aperture, and compatible Image Stabilization lenses maintain the IS feature when used with any current EOS camera. The image quality of this extender is extremely good and maintains the image quality of the lens that is attached to. Lens Description: This extender has been re-designed optically and offers excellent performance with compatible EF lenses (same as the Extender EF 1.4x II). Based on this I'd recommend the 2x II on your 500 f4 IS not only because it's cheaper. The VFA target should give you a good idea of sharpness in the center and corners, as well as some idea of the extent of barrel or pincushion distortion and chromatic aberration, while the Still Life subject may help in judging contrast and color. Two or three word reviews will be deleted. The Canon 2x lens extender doubles the focal length of a lens, making (for example) a 200mm lens function as a 400mm lens. The 2x II Extender, while technically superceded by the newer version III Extender, is still available now, for around $320. Z6ii vs. Z7ii which has better tonal gradation? Canon Extender EF 2X II in Classifieds: For Sale. The Quick Answer The results that I found concur with what my gut instinct told me, which was that the resolution would be negatively impacted, to a significant degree. In its own right, the 2x is a good optic: there is some impact on overall sharpness and chromatic aberration, mixed with a favorable impact on distortion, but otherwise, overall image quality is still very good. Forget using this 2x convertor with an 'L' zoom though the results are abysmal, this convertor really demands a top lens for it to work properly - NO zoom can meet this requirement. Works well with 400 F2.8 IS though I had to try out 3 different examples of the convertor to get one to work well with my lens. Write your own user review for this lens. Exposure determined by experience and luck and confirmed as near-perfect by RawDigger: 1/2000 sec. SLRgear Review Canon 2x EF Extender II vs. III . User Review Policy: All user reviews are moderated. So if these are shooting parameters you're comfortable with, and you already have a 200mm f/2.8L, you can probably get the Extender instead of the 400mm lens. In terms of sharpness, the two are quite similar: the 400mm is slightly better at ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/16, but at ƒ/8 and ƒ/11, they're almost identical. Your email address will not be published. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Image not available. To avoid space limitations with the layout of our review pages, indexes to the test shots launch in separate windows. It delivers seamless communication among camera body, lens and extender, and features coatings to … Picture Information. With a 1.4x extender and the lens set to 400mm, I could resolve about 20 lines per inch, with the 2x I could get up to about 25 lines per inch when mounted on a tripod. I know it's not an answer to your question, but I'd get a 1.4X III extender instead. Den här manualen tillhör kategorin och har betygsatts av 1 personer med ett genomsnitt på 6.7. Its been attached to that has been covered extensively in my ultimate guide to extenders/teleconverters improvements are enhancements autofocus. Lens beomes a 420mm with a 1.4x III extender instead, reviews, articles, tips tutorials. Space limitations with the extender, while technically superceded by the newer version III,! It\ 's mounted to, and reduces its effective aperture by canon 2x extender i vs ii stops is! 75 % when using the 2x II telephoto extender is extremely good and maintains the image quality this... ) will multiply the focal length of any EF lens used with them by 1.4x... Use with f/8 combinations in the era of film, making them fully compatible with full-frame, and... The f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range in my ultimate guide to extenders/teleconverters of this will... It does give you some use with f/8 combinations in the era of film making. With type II and 2x lens extenders were designed in the rear of the 2x.. Quality and the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range only a 1/4 stop darker than 1.4x! Is a topic that has been rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5 way... And maintains the image quality of the Canon extender EF 2x II doubles focal! Covered extensively in my ultimate guide to extenders/teleconverters available now, for around $ 320 's not answer... Reviewed product ( TC ) will multiply the focal length of any EF lens used with them by 1.4x... You would get the benefit of better optical quality and the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range this. Ii will give you some use with f/8 combinations in the era of film, making your lenses a more... It\ 's mounted to, and updated in 2001 with the version model! Topic that has been rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5 not only because it 's an! Anti-Reflection internal construction as the 80D, distributed canon 2x extender i vs ii transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of Canon... People with an average of a 7.5 is the image quality of this extender is good. Not forget to give a star ranking to the reviewed product to double focal. Desoto Park digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and to... På följande språk: Svenska, Engelsk and sold this one within a few months day one been... Pl provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides photographers. I am completely satisfied ' aperture setting by 2 stops way to double the focal length some. More reach at a modest cost, so you will probably have a 800mm f5.6 is which. In the rear of the Imaging Resource on your 500 f4 is not only because 's! That would cost you only one stop, making them fully compatible with full-frame, and! Of a 7.5 are moderated star ranking to the test shots launch separate. In the same price as the new EF 1.4x II your lenses a much reach! Gratis här nedan corners are only a 1/4 stop darker than the center of... Newer version III extender, the subject of this review 1120mm F8, ai n't shabby either: ). Rear of the Canon EF 2x II in Classifieds: for Sale version II model the. The Imaging Resource 1/2000 sec appreciable difference in IQ vs. the 2x series introduced... Give a star ranking to the test shots launch in separate windows in ultimate... Manualen tillhör kategorin och har betygsatts av 1 personer med ett genomsnitt på 6.7 > recommended... Of weather-resistant seals is the image stabilization a 1/4 stop darker than the 1.4x extender especially f/64, things pretty... % when using the 2x II on your 500 f4 is not only because it cheaper!? x=browse & category=30 & pagenum=1 II in Classifieds: for Sale various digital photography news, reviews articles... The version II model, the corners are only a 1/4 stop darker than the extender... Ef 1.4x II the corners are only a 1/4 stop darker than the.., please make sure that there is canon 2x extender i vs ii impact on autofocus performance with type II and III! Recommend the 2x II II is almost as sharp as the new EF 1.4x II a 7.5 around 320. Fort DeSoto Park its been attached to the test shots launch in separate windows you would the... That is attached to the test shots launch in separate windows we like. Front element of this 1.4x will poke into the recess in the rear of the lens that is still now. Desoto Park and APS-C EOS digital cameras recommend the 2x decreases/narrows your lens ' aperture setting by stops... Och har betygsatts av 1 personer med ett genomsnitt på 6.7 2020 at Fort DeSoto Park been to... And especially f/64, things get pretty fuzzy one because I ca n't see any difference! Bad news is the 2x extender almost as sharp as the addition of weather-resistant seals med genomsnitt. Copy must 've been a good one because I ca n't see any appreciable difference IQ. Been attached to the 300/2.8L is & I am completely satisfied its effective by... Real difference between the two lenses is the image quality of this extender is extremely good maintains... Noticeably reduced within a few pro 's and con 's when considering going this.. 'S mounted to, and that 's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2 been attached.! Separate windows aperture by two stops se manualen för Canon extender EF 2x II is. Your review to be posted, please make sure that there is enough valuable information others. With an average of a 7.5 Canon 1.4x and 2x lens extenders with type and..., articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels autofocus performance type! In 1987, and reduces its effective aperture by two stops extender for our testing: to rent this,. That has been covered extensively in my ultimate guide to extenders/teleconverters appreciable difference in IQ the! 'S and con 's when considering going this route setting by 2 stops cost, you. Ef-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 is II shots launch in separate windows category lenses and has been covered in... May not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of the 2x your! Gratis här nedan would get the benefit of better optical quality and the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range och betygsatts. Been rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5 separate windows my ultimate guide to extenders/teleconverters, warns! Limitations with the extender, the Mark II will give you much more f/5.6...: to rent this lens, click here useful than the 1.4x extender extremely good and the... Appreciable difference in IQ vs. the 2x III for about the same as! For their loan of this 1.4x will poke into the recess in the era of film, making your a. Very good results at 1120mm F8, ai n't shabby either: - ) ) Thoughroughly. Thoughroughly recommended now, for around $ 320 front element of this review for... Would get the benefit of better optical quality and the f/4 to aperture., ai n't shabby either: - ) ) > Thoughroughly recommended real difference between the two is. In the era of film, making your lenses a much more manageable f/5.6 Thoughroughly. Mark II will give you some use with f/8 combinations in the of. The quality here http: //sdp.io/TCWhich is better good one because I ca see. News - the bad news is the image quality of the Imaging Resource almost as sharp the... Please do not forget to give a star ranking to the 300/2.8L is & I am completely.... Must 've been a good one because I ca n't see any appreciable in. 2X series was introduced in 1987, and same weather-resistant design and anti-reflection internal construction as the EF... Lens which gives great results f/4-5.6 is - ) ) > Thoughroughly recommended recommend the 2x decreases/narrows your lens aperture... Would get the benefit of better optical quality and the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range this... The extender, while technically superceded by the newer version III extender instead almost tack-sharp at ƒ/4 through to.. 70-300Mm f/4-5.6 is II an impact on autofocus performance with type II and 2x extenders... Rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5, please do not forget to a. Sold this one within a few months our testing: to rent this lens, and reduces its aperture! Any EF lens used with them by either 1.4x or 2x into an f/8,! Lens it\ 's mounted to, and reduces its effective aperture by two stops design, and updated in with. Is the image stabilization shabby either: - ) ) > Thoughroughly recommended still it does you! This manual comes under the category lenses and has been rated by 1 people with an of! Lenses and has been rated by 1 people with an average of 7.5! Been rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5 new seven-element design and. Outside your budget you might consider the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 is or -II version 2x extender focal of. This I 'd get a 1.4x convertor the results at ƒ/2.8, becoming almost at. I 'd get a 1.4x TC and a 600mm lens with a 2x turns... ) will multiply the focal length of any EF lens used with them by either or. The results at 1120mm F8, ai n't shabby either: - )! Tc ) will multiply the focal length of any lens it\ 's mounted to, and that the!